Comparing the Use of Crotaline-Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) Versus Observation in Children

Author:

Rohl Stephen1ORCID,Meredith Mark1,Anderson Tucker2,Clark Alexander3,Snider Mark1,Bruccoleri Rebecca4,Williams Saralyn,Hayes Tristan,Tolley Elizabeth,Gienapp Andrew J.5,Seger Donna4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics-Emergency Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis

2. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics

3. Department of Emergency Medicine

4. Tennessee Poison Control Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville

5. Children's Foundation Research Institute, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN.

Abstract

Objectives In the United States, studies are inconclusive regarding the indications for polyvalent antivenom administration for crotaline envenomation. We compared polyvalent antivenom administration versus observation used at 2 separate institutions. We hypothesized that deferring antivenom leads to increased hospital length of stay and surgical interventions. Methods Retrospective chart review of children who presented to Le Bonheur Children's Hospital (LBCH) in Memphis, Tennessee, and Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt (MCJCHV) in Nashville, Tennessee, from 2009 to 2021. Patient demographics, treatment utilization, bite location, and outcomes from both sites were statistically examined. Results A total of 183 patients met the inclusion criteria (123 at LBCH, 60 at MCJCHV). At LBCH, mean age was 9.2 years, 54% were male, and 79% of known snakes identified as copperheads. At MCJCHV, mean age was 8.9 years, 65% were male, and 88% of known snakes identified as copperheads. The most commonly envenomated areas for both sites were the foot (42%), hand (27%), and ankle (26%). Patients at LBCH were managed with antivenom only 25% of the time, whereas 75% were observed; 82% of MCJCHV patients were managed with antivenom (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in length of stay (mean, 1.5 days at LBCH and 1.8 days at MCJCHV; P = 0.136) or surgical intervention (3.3% of LBCH encounters, 5.0% of MCJCHV encounters; P = 0.685). Secondary outcomes aside from coagulopathy and admission location (intensive care unit vs floor) were also not significant. Conclusions The use of antivenom did not impact hospital length of stay or surgical interventions. Our results should be interpreted cautiously as our study reflects regional experiences with snake species in the Southeast United States and not North America as a whole. Other institutional differences in management and smaller n at MCJCHV may have contributed to different outcomes. Further study is needed to determine intermediate and long-term effects of deferring antivenom use.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3