Challenges of Families of Patients Hospitalized in the PICU: A Preplanned Secondary Analysis From the Navigate Dataset*

Author:

Tager Julia B.1,Hinojosa Jessica T.2,LiaBraaten Brynn M.3,Balistreri Kathryn A.1,Aniciete Danica4,Charleston Elizabeth56,Frader Joel E.7,White Douglas B.8,Clayman Marla L.910,Sorce Lauren R.71112,Davies W. Hobart1,Rothschild Charles B.13,Michelson Kelly N.711,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.

2. Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University—Carbondale, Carbondale, IL.

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin & Jane B. Pettit Pain and Headache Center, Children’s Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

4. Department of Oncology, Sharp Healthcare, San Diego, CA.

5. Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL.

6. Division of Child Abuse Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

7. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

8. Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

9. Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford, MA.

10. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, MA.

11. Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

12. Department of Nursing, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

13. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe challenges experienced by parents of children hospitalized in the PICU during PICU admission as reported by family navigators. DESIGN: A preplanned secondary analysis of open-response data coded via inductive qualitative approach from the Navigate randomized controlled trial (RCT) dataset (ID NCT02333396). SETTING: Two university-affiliated PICUs in the Midwestern United States as part of an RCT. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-four parents of 190 PICU patients. INTERVENTIONS: In 2015–2017, trained family navigators assessed and addressed parent needs, offered weekly family meetings, and provided post-PICU discharge parent check-ins as part of a study investigating the effectiveness of a communication support intervention (“PICU Supports”). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed qualitative data recorded by family navigators weekly across 338 encounters. Navigators described families’ “biggest challenge,” “communication challenges,” and ways the team could better support the family. We used an inductive qualitative coding approach and a modified member-checking exercise. The most common difficulties included home life, hospitalization, and diagnosis distress (45.2%, 29.0%, and 17.2% of families, respectively). Navigators often identified that parents had co-occurring challenges. Communication was identified as a “biggest challenge” for 8% of families. Communication challenges included lack of information, team communication, and communication quality (7.0%, 4.8%, and 4.8% of families, respectively). Suggestions for improving care included better medical communication, listening, rapport, and resources. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes families’ experiences and challenges assessed throughout the PICU stay. Family navigators reported families frequently experience stressors both internal and external to the hospital environment, and communication challenges between families and providers may be additional sources of distress. Further research should develop and assess interventions aimed at improving provider-family communication and reducing stressors outside the hospitalization itself, such as home life difficulties.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3