Randomization to a Liberal Versus Conservative Oxygenation Target: Redox Responses in Critically Ill Children

Author:

Jones Gareth A. L.12,Eaton Simon3,Orford Michael3,Ray Samiran12,Wiley Daisy4,Ramnarayan Padmanabhan56,Inwald David6,Grocott Michael P. W.7,Griksaitis Michael78,Pappachan John78,O’Neill Lauran2,Mouncey Paul R.4,Harrison David A.4,Rowan Kathryn M.4,Peters Mark J.12,

Affiliation:

1. Respiratory Critical Care and Anaesthesia Unit, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

2. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

3. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

4. Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.

5. Children’s Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

6. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

7. Anaesthesia Perioperative and Critical Care Research Group, Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/ University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

8. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Southampton Children’s Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Abstract

RATIONALE: Optimal systemic oxygenation targets in pediatric critical illness are unknown. A U-shaped relationship exists between blood oxygen levels and PICU mortality. Redox stress or iatrogenic injury from intensive treatments are potential mechanisms of harm from hyperoxia. OBJECTIVES: To measure biomarkers of oxidative status in children admitted to PICU and randomized to conservative (oxygen-hemoglobin saturation [Spo 2] 88–92%) versus liberal (Spo 2 > 94%) peripheral oxygenation targets. DESIGN: Mechanistic substudy nested within the Oxygen in PICU (Oxy-PICU) pilot randomized feasibility clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03040570). SETTING: Three U.K. mixed medical and surgical PICUs in university hospitals. PATIENTS: Seventy-five eligible patients randomized to the Oxy-PICU randomized feasibility clinical trial. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization to a conservative (Spo 2 88–92%) versus liberal (Spo 2 > 94%) peripheral oxygenation target. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood and urine samples were collected at two timepoints: less than 24 hours and up to 72 hours from randomization in trial participants (March 2017 to July 2017). Plasma was analyzed for markers of ischemic/oxidative response, namely thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS; lipid peroxidation marker) and ischemia-modified albumin (protein oxidation marker). Total urinary nitrate/nitrite was measured as a marker of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). Blood hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)–1a messenger RNA (mRNA) expression (hypoxia response gene) was measured by reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction. Total urinary nitrate/nitrite levels were greater in the liberal compared with conservative oxygenation group at 72 hours (median difference 32.6 μmol/mmol of creatinine [95% CI 13.7–93.6]; p < 0.002, Mann-Whitney test). HIF-1a mRNA expression was increased in the conservative group compared with liberal in less than 24-hour samples (6.0-fold [95% CI 1.3–24.0]; p = 0.032). There were no significant differences in TBARS or ischemia-modified albumin. CONCLUSIONS: On comparing liberal with conservative oxygenation targets, we show, first, significant redox response (increase in urinary markers of RONS), but no changes in markers of lipid or protein oxidation. We also show what appears to be an early hypoxic response (increase in HIF-1a gene expression) in subjects exposed to conservative rather than liberal oxygenation targets.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Editor’s Choice Articles for September;Pediatric Critical Care Medicine;2023-09

2. Editor’s Choice Articles for March;Pediatric Critical Care Medicine;2023-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3