MetALD: Does it require a different therapeutic option?

Abstract

New guidelines for the definitions of steatotic liver disease have named the entity of metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD) as an overlap condition of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease. There is a broad range of therapeutics in all stages of development for MASLD, but these therapeutics, in general, have not been studied in patients with significant ongoing alcohol use. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the endogenous and exogenous risks for MASLD and MetALD. Rational strategies for therapeutic intervention in MetALD include biopsychosocial interventions, alcohol use cessation strategies, including the use of medications for alcohol use disorder, and judicious use of therapeutics for steatotic liver disease. Therapeutics with promise for MetALD include incretin-based therapies, FGF21 agonists, thyroid hormone receptor beta agonists, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, and agents to modify de novo lipogenesis. Currently, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ agonists have the largest body of literature supporting their use in MASLD, and there is a paucity of agents in trials for alcohol-associated liver disease. From existing studies, it is not clear if unique therapeutics or a combinatorial approach are needed for MetALD. Further elucidation of the safety and benefits of MASLD-related therapies is of paramount importance for advancing therapeutics for MetALD in carefully designed inclusive clinical trials.