Utility of methylated DNA markers for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures
Author:
Cooley Matthew A.1ORCID, Schneider Amber R.2, Barr Fritcher Emily G.2ORCID, Milosevic Dragana2ORCID, Levy Michael J.3, Bridgeman Amber R.2ORCID, Martin John A.3, Petersen Bret T.3, Abu Dayyeh Barham K.3ORCID, Storm Andrew C.3ORCID, Law Ryan J.3, Vargas Eric J.3ORCID, Garimella Vishal3, Zemla Tyler4, Jenkins Sarah M.4, Yin Jun4, Gores Gregory J.3ORCID, Roberts Lewis R.3ORCID, Kipp Benjamin R.2ORCID, Chandrasekhara Vinay3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 3. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Abstract
Background and Aims:
Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort.
Approach:
Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology.
Results:
Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%–95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
Conclusions:
The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference41 articles.
1. Biliary tract cancers in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976-2008;Yang;Am J Gastroenterol,2012 2. DNA methylation markers for detection of cholangiocarcinoma: Discovery, validation, and clinical testing in biliary brushings and plasma;Yang;Hepatol Commun,2021 3. Comparison of clinical features and outcomes between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States;Lee;Hepatology,2021 4. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: The next horizon in mechanisms and management;Banales;Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2020 5. Biliary tract cancers: Epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis and genetic risk associations;Marcano-Bonilla;Chin Clin Oncol,2016
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|