Affiliation:
1. Political Science, Texas A&M University
2. Political Science, Texas A&M
Abstract
The Book Citation indices in the Web of Science Core Collection of citation data could be of enormous importance for those scholarly disciplines for which books are major research products. If well constructed and implemented, these indices could better capture the full body of individual scholars’ work than the article citation indices alone do, as well as how that full body of work is recognized by citations from later publications. Individual scholars, their scholarly peers, and book publishers would all benefit from such indices. Yet there is no systematic evidence on how the Book Citation Indices are constructed or on how comprehensively they capture important scholarly work in books. We present original empirical evidence in a case study for the discipline of political science that indicates the Web of Science Book Citation Index is failing to meet its stated ambitions – because it is not well structured to achieve those ambitions and not well marketed to the essential actors in the publishing industry who are critical for it to function as intended.
Publisher
University of Michigan Library
Reference20 articles.
1. The Field-Specific Citation and Usage Patterns of Book Literature in the Book Citation Index.;Research Evaluation,2020
2. Putting Personality in Context: Determinants of Research Productivity and Impact in Political Science.;Scientometrics,2020
3. Psychometric Studies of Scientific Talent and Eminence
4. Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.;PS: Political Science and Politics,2003
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献