Affiliation:
1. The authors are in the Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7223, USA.(J.M.S.B)
Abstract
Genetic and environmental interventions that extend life span are a current focus in research on the biology of aging. Most of this work has focused on differences among genotypes and species. A recent study on fruit flies shows that life span extension because of dietary restriction can be highly sex-specific. Here we review the literature on sex-specific effects of 56 genetic and 41 environmental interventions that extend life span in
Drosophila melanogaster
. We found that only one-sixth of the experiments provided statistical tests of differences in response between males and females, suggesting that sex-specific effects have been largely ignored. When measured, the life span extension was female-biased in 8 of 16 cases, male-biased in 5 of 16 cases, and not significantly different in only 3 of 16 cases. We discuss possible explanations for the sex-specific differences and suggest various ways in which we might test these hypotheses. We argue that understanding sex differences in the response to life span-extending manipulations should lead to new insights about the basic mechanisms that underlie the biology of aging in both sexes.
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Reference93 articles.
1. W. J. Baerg, Tarantula life history records. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 71, 233-238 (1963).
2. W. J. Baerg, The life cycle and mating habits of the male tarantula. Q. Rev. Biol. 3, 109-116 (1928).
3. R. F. Foelix Biology of Spiders (Oxford University Press New York 1996).
4. A. K. Lee A. Cockburn Evolutionary Ecology of Marsupials (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1985).
5. D. W. McDonald The Encyclopedia of Mammals (Facts or File Publications New York 1984).
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献