Water isotope ratios reflect convection intensity rather than rain type proportions in the pantropics

Author:

Yu Wusheng1ORCID,Guo Rong12,Thompson Lonnie G.3ORCID,Zhang Jingyi1,Lewis Stephen4ORCID,Jing Zhaowei5ORCID,He Junmei16,Ma Yaoming127ORCID,Xu Baiqing1,Wu Guangjian1ORCID,Zhou Xu1,Tang Wenjun1,Wang Qiaoyi12,Ren Pengjie12,Zhang Zhuanxia12,Qu Dongmei1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

3. Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

4. Catchment to Reef Research Group, Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.

5. Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao 266061, China.

6. Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China.

7. College of Atmospheric Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.

Abstract

Against the traditional view, a recently published theory argued that isotope ratios are higher in convective precipitation but lower in stratiform precipitation and proposed that isotope ratios reflect rain type proportions. This theory has been widely cited despite some early reservations. Whether the theory represents a faithful reflection of signals of water isotope ratios remains unclear. Here, we reassess its validity from different timescales and broader observations from the pantropics. Unexpectedly, our findings contradict the theory on daily, monthly, and even annual timescales. Pantropical precipitation isotope ratios remain strongly correlated to convection intensity but are independent of rain type proportions because stratiform precipitation isotope ratios cover a large range of values. We find that the theory has many serious weaknesses related to preferential data selection and suggest that new theories need to be validated at more locations on different timescales before gaining widespread acceptance.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3