The impact of population-wide rapid antigen testing on SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in Slovakia

Author:

Pavelka Martin123ORCID,Van-Zandvoort Kevin45ORCID,Abbott Sam45ORCID,Sherratt Katharine45ORCID,Majdan Marek6ORCID,Jarčuška Pavol7,Krajčí Marek1,Flasche Stefan45ORCID,Funk Sebastian45ORCID, ,

Affiliation:

1. Slovak Ministry of Health, Bratislava, Slovakia.

2. Inštitút Zdravotných Analýz (Institute of Health Analyses), Bratislava, Slovakia.

3. Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

4. Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

5. Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

6. Institute for Global Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University, Trnava, Slovakia.

7. Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia.

Abstract

The Slovakian test case Toward the end of 2020, Slovakia decided that it would test and then isolate positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases among its entire population of ∼5.5 million, and more than 50,000 positive cases were found during a rapid antigen testing campaign. Pavelka et al. analyzed the data and found that in 41 counties before and after the two rounds of testing, infection prevalence declined by about 80% (see the Perspective by García-Fiñana and Buchan). They also used the data to test a microsimulation model for one county. Quarantine of the whole household after a positive test was essential to achieving a large reduction in prevalence. Since Autumn 2020, transmission in Slovakia has rebounded, despite other interventions, because high-intensity testing was not sustainable. Science , this issue p. 635 ; see also p. 571

Funder

Wellcome

ir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society

Elrha’s Research for Health in Humanitarian Crises

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference39 articles.

1. Guidelines for the implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19. Eur. Cent. Dis. Prev. Control (2020); www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/covid-19-guidelines-non-pharmaceutical-interventions.

2. N. G. Davies., Lancet Public Health 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30133-X (2020).

3. Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe

4. Everyone Included Social Impact of COVID-19–Dros. Inf. Serv. D; www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/everyone-included-covid-19.html.

5. Socio-economic impact of COVID-19. UNDP; www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/coronavirus/socio-economic-impact-of-covid-19.html.

Cited by 157 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3