On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect

Author:

Dijksterhuis Ap1,Bos Maarten W.1,Nordgren Loran F.1,van Baaren Rick B.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Contrary to conventional wisdom, it is not always advantageous to engage in thorough conscious deliberation before choosing. On the basis of recent insights into the characteristics of conscious and unconscious thought, we tested the hypothesis that simple choices (such as between different towels or different sets of oven mitts) indeed produce better results after conscious thought, but that choices in complex matters (such as between different houses or different cars) should be left to unconscious thought. Named the “deliberation-without-attention” hypothesis, it was confirmed in four studies on consumer choice, both in the laboratory as well as among actual shoppers, that purchases of complex products were viewed more favorably when decisions had been made in the absence of attentive deliberation.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference32 articles.

1. It is important to note that attention to the problem at hand is the crucial distinction in our definitions of conscious and unconscious thought. Thinking about buying a new car while attention is directed at possible new cars is conscious thought. Thinking about buying a new car while attention is temporarily directed elsewhere is unconscious thought. This distinction does not mean that conscious thought only comprises conscious processes. One can compare it to speech. Speech is a conscious process (i.e. attention is directed at it while one speaks) but it is in part dependent on accompanying unconscious processes (such as processes responsible for syntax or word choice).

2. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes 1984

3. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding 1689

4. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict Choice and Commitment 1977

5. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice

Cited by 763 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Complexity in online collective assessments: Implications for the wisdom of the crowd;Technological Forecasting and Social Change;2024-03

2. Effect of cognitive load on time spent offline during wakefulness;Cerebral Cortex;2024-01-31

3. References;Consumer Neuroscience;2024

4. Decision making;Consumer Neuroscience;2024

5. Electoral Coordination Under Simple and Complex Electoral Systems: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis;Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy;2023-12-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3