Reliability of Protocol Reviews for Animal Research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reliability of Protocol Reviews for Animal Research

Published:2001-07-27 Issue:5530 Volume:293 Page:608-609
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Plous Scott¹,Herzog Harold²

Affiliation:

1. S. Plous is in the Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459-0408, USA.

2. H. Herzog is in the Department of Psychology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference17 articles.

1. Dresser R., JAVMA (J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.)194, 1184 (1989).

2. Based on the Carnegie Foundation Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.

3. Research protocols covered areas such as behavioral neuroscience psychopharmacology animal cognition and perception comparative psychology and ethology (for details see www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/293/5530/608/DC1).

4. 9 Code of Federal Regulations Subpart C (§2.31 Animals and Animal Products 1 January 2000 ed.).

5. Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals (American Psychological Association Washington DC 1992).

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ethics review of animal research;The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animals;2024-03-14

2. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Ethics in Biomedical Animal Research in Mexico;Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science;2023-11-11

3. Animal Research;The Moral Implications of Human and Animal Vulnerability;2023

4. Mission Creep or Mission Lapse? Scientific Review in Research Oversight;AJOB Empirical Bioethics;2022-09-20

5. 36. Aspect-seeing in animal research: the absence of justice in the harm-benefit analysis;Transforming food systems: ethics, innovation and responsibility;2022-09-01