Affiliation:
1. Jim Austin is Editor of Science
Careers.
2. Bruce Alberts is Editor-in-Chief of
Science.
Abstract
There was a time not so long ago when new Science Ph.D.s in the United States
were expected to pursue a career path in academia. But today, most graduates end
up working outside academia, not only in industry but also in careers such as
science policy, communications, knowledge brokering, and patent law.
*
Partly this is a result of how bleak the
academic job market is, but there is also a rising awareness of career options
that Ph.D. scientists haven't trained for directly—but for which they
have useful knowledge, skills, and experience. Still, “there is a huge
disconnect between how we currently train scientists and the actual employment
opportunities available for them,”
†
and an urgent need for dramatic improvements in training
programs to help close the gap. One critical step that could help to drive
change would be to require Ph.D. students and postdoctoral scientists to follow
an individual development plan (IDP).
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Promoting crucial team building, collaboration, and communication skills in graduate students through interactive retreats;Advances in Physiology Education;2023-12-01
2. The Changing Landscape of Doctoral Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: PhD Students, Faculty Advisors, and Preferences for Varied Career Options;Frontiers in Psychology;2021-12-17
3. Use of individual development plans for nurse scientist training;Nursing Outlook;2020-05
4. Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency;Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management;2019-02-28
5. Consensus, Division, and the Future of Graduate Education in the Chemical Sciences;Journal of Chemical Education;2019-01-24