Affiliation:
1. Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Abstract
South African mathematics teachers in the Senior Phase (Grades 8 and 9) were introduced to the pedagogical tool, meaning equivalence reusable learning objects (MERLO), as a formative assessment (FA) strategy to promote and support teachers’ professional growth in using FA practices in the classroom. The cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) and meta-didactical transposition (MDT) were used to frame the evolution process of teachers’ praxeologies. In this study we used qualitative participatory action research that encompassed 3 phases: pre-MERLO phase, MERLO workshop and post-MERLO phase. The study was conducted in the northeast of Pretoria in the Tshwane district in the Gauteng province, South Africa. Twelve Senior Phase mathematics teachers were purposively sampled in 6 public schools before the workshop training. During the workshop training, only 5 teachers participated due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The data collection techniques included pre- and post-interviews, workshop training sessions, classroom observations, field notes, teachers’ reflective journals, teachers’ lesson plans, learners’ workbooks and learners’ worksheets, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that the teachers acquired adequate knowledge and skills to effectively structure and integrate the lesson plan of teachers’ didactical praxeologies as FA activities into their mathematics classrooms. The findings also reveal that the learners showed more interest and motivation, were actively involved, developed a deeper understanding of mathematics content, and showed increased autonomy in learning. Future research could involve implementing MERLO in all South African provinces and introducing MERLO to other emerging countries. However, the findings of this study are based on a limited sample of teachers and schools, and the recommendation is that, for future studies, more teachers should be involved in the MERLO professional development.
Publisher
Education Association of South Africa
Reference125 articles.
1. Andersson C & Palm T 2017. The impact of formative assessment of student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practices after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learning and Instruction, 49:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Learninstruc.2016.12.006
2. Andersson C & Palm T 2018. Reasons for teachers’ successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development - a motivation perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6):576–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1430685
3. Arrafii MA & Sumarni B 2018. Teachers’ understanding of formative assessment. Lingua Cultura, 12(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i1.2113
4. Arzarello F, Kenett RS, Robutti O, Shafrir U, Prodromou T & Carante P 2015. Teaching and assessing with new methodological tools (MERLO): A new pedagogy? In MA Hersh & M Kotecha (eds). IMA International Conference on Barriers and Enablers to Learning Maths: Enhancing Learning and Teaching for All Learners. Glasgow, Scotland. Available at https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1580275/180494/Arzarello%20et%20al..pdf. Accessed 10 June 2015.
5. Arzarello F, Robutti O, Sabena C, Cusi A, Garuti R, Malara N & Martignone F 2014. Meta-didactical transposition: A theoretical model for teacher education programmes. In A Clark-Wilson, O Robutti & N Sinclair (eds). The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1_15