Measurement and Construct-Level Invariance of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)

Author:

Buil J. Marieke12ORCID,Kösters Mia P.3ORCID,Koot Hans M.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Epidemiology, Health Promotion & Care Innovation, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract: Measurement and construct-level invariance of the Dutch Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale’s test scores (RCADS) across gender and ethnic (minority) backgrounds of the four largest ethnic groups of children living in the Netherlands (i.e., native Dutch; Moroccan; Turkish; or Surinamese/Antillean) was evaluated. Symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder were rated by 2,679 mainstream elementary schoolchildren ( Mage = 10.61). Results from discrete multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses showed that factor means were generally insensitive to gender bias. However, moderate violations of measurement invariance between native Dutch and the three ethnic minority groups were found for social phobia, panic disorder, and separation anxiety disorder symptoms. Girls had higher mean levels on all RCADS subscales compared to boys. Furthermore, with a few exceptions, children from ethnic minority groups reported higher levels of symptoms of panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder compared to native Dutch children. Scores derived from the RCADS are largely comparable between elementary school boys and girls, but for three out of six subscales, caution is warranted when comparing mean level differences of native Dutch children with children of Turkish, Moroccan, and Surinamese/Antillean ethnic backgrounds.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3