Anxiety, Age, and Gender in Agitation Patients Installed Conventional Restraint in Inpatient Room
-
Published:2022-12-30
Issue:2
Volume:4
Page:349-355
-
ISSN:2809-3208
-
Container-title:Journal of Applied Nursing and Health
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:janh
Author:
Suwardianto Heru,Kurniajati Sandy
Abstract
Background: Some variables that may influence age and gender. The study aimed to determine whether there is a relationship between anxiety and gender in Agitation patients with conventional restraint in the Inpatient Room.
Methods: This research method uses the correlation method with a cross-sectional design. A research sample is several patients who receive restrain intervention, totaling 27 respondents. The sampling technique was purposive, with the patient inclusion criteria on the RASS scale of +1 to -1. The family agreed for the patient to be a respondent. The independent variable is anxiety, while the dependent variable is age and gender. Anxiety instrument using FASS (Face Anxiety Scale Statistical Test using Spearmen rho with a <0.05. This study has received Ethical Approval from the STIKES Kediri Baptist Hospital.
Results: The statistical test results on anxiety with age obtained a p-value of 0.051 with a <0.05, which means there is no relationship between anxiety and age in respondents with anxiety in patients with restraints. The results of statistical tests on the anxiety variable with sex get a p-value of 0.551 with a <0.05, which means that there is no relationship between anxiety and type gender in patients with restraint
Conclusion: Age and gender have no relationship with anxiety in patients. Agitation is installed with Conventional Restraints in the Inpatient Room. For further research, it is necessary to use a more significant number of respondents to see the broader significance.
Publisher
Lembaga Chakra Brahmanda Lentera
Reference24 articles.
1. Agustin, I., Putri, P., Muliyadi, Endriyani, S., & Oktaviani, L. (2022). Implementation Of Mobilization Support Nursing in Post-Operational Sectio Caesarian Patients With Physical Mobility Disorders. Journal of Applied Nursing and Health, 4(1 SE-Articles), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.55018/janh.v4i1.58 2. Al-Maraira, O. A., & Hayajneh, F. A. (2019). Use of restraint and seclusion in psychiatric settings: A literature review. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 57(4), 32–39. 3. Aubanel, S., Bruiset, F., Chapuis, C., Chanques, G., & Payen, J.-F. (2020). Therapeutic options for agitation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 39(5), 639–646. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S235255682030165X 4. Barr, J., Fraser, G. L., Puntillo, K., Ely, E. W., Devlin, J. W., Kress, J. P., Joffe, A. M., Coursin, D., Herr, D. I., Ramsay, M. A., Riker, R. R., Sessler, C. N., Pun, B., Skrobik, Y., & Jaeschke, R. (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Society of Critical Care Medicine, The American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM), 41(1), 263–306. 5. Burry, L., Rose, L., & Ricou, B. (2018). Physical restraint: time to let go How common is the use of physical restraint? Intensive Care Med, 44, 1296–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5000-0
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|