CONDITIONAL DEFERRAL (AND WITHDRAWAL) OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FROM NATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE

Author:

Burić ZoranORCID,Pleić MarijaORCID,Radić IvanaORCID

Abstract

Conditional deferral (and withdrawal) of criminal prosecution is a typical institution of negotiated criminal justice. It is usually applied in relation to less serious criminal offences with the aim to relieve the court system workload and humanise the treatment of the offender. This institution was introduced into the Croatian criminal justice system more than 20 years ago. Despite such a long presence within the system, it has never acquired the status of an important and widely applied institution. Quite the contrary, its application in practice is quite scarce. In order to identify possible reasons for this at the normative level, the authors have undertaken a comparative legal analysis of said institution. Main characteristics of conditional deferral (and withdrawal) of criminal prosecution in Croatia have been compared with the main characteristics of identical or equivalent institutions in five other jurisdictions: Austria, Germany, Italy, England, and France. Special attention has been devoted to five highlighted issues: the goal(s) of the institution, the offences in relation to which it may be applied, the role of the court, the rights of the defendant, and the position of the victim.

Publisher

Faculty of Law Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference32 articles.

1. Boyne, S., Procedural Economy in Pre-Trial Procedure: Developments in Germany and the United States (October 23, 2013, last revised December 1, 2015), Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-39, pp. 329- 368.

2. Boyne, S., The German Prosecution Service, Guardians of the Law? Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014

3. Caianiello, M., The Italian Public Prosecutor: An Inquisitorial Figure in Adversarial Proceedings? in: Luna, E.; Wade, M. (eds), Transnational perspectives on prosecutorial power, Oxford University Press, 2011

4. Caporotundo, F., L'estinzione del reato per condotte riparatorie: luci ed ombre dell'art. 162-ter c.p., Archivio penale, 2018, n. 1, pp. 1 - 38

5. Carić, M., Skraćeni oblici kaznenog postupka, doktorski rad, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu, Split, 2012,

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3