PROBLEM „TEŽINA“ SUKOBLJENIH USTAVNIH NAČELA U ANALIZI PROPORCIONALNOSTI (ODVAGIVANJU)

Author:

Keršić MarinORCID

Abstract

This paper deals with the antinomies between constitutional principles by analysing balancing as one of the methods to solve the problem. More specifically, the author focuses on the balancing test in the context of proportionality and the question of the “weight” of the right. Firstly, the paper analyses the notions of constitutional principles and antinomies. Next, these notions are contextualised in the legal system of the Republic of Croatia using the example of the conflict between the protection of private and family life, dignity, reputation, and honour (Art. 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia), freedom of thought and expression (Art. 38 of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia). By deploying the analysis of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia and the European Court of Human Rights in the mentioned conflict, the paper presents theoretical conclusions regarding balancing and the question of the “weight” of the rights. The paper has two goals: First, point out the problems present in the balancing test related to the idea of the “weight” of the rights; second, present proposals that may lead to a clearer understanding of the notions introduced.

Publisher

Faculty of Law Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference50 articles.

1. Abramović A, 'Općeprihvaćena načela kao kriterij za tumačenje pravne norme' (2014), Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 1 pristupljeno 21. lipnja 2022.

2. Aleinikoff T A, 'Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing' (1987) 96(5) The Yale Law Journal 943

3. Alexy R, 'On the Structure of Legal Principles' (2000) 13(3) Ratio Juris 294

4. Alexy R, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press, 2002)

5. Alexy R, 'Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality' (2003) 16(2) Ratio Juris 131

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3