Physical activity implementation in the curricula of healthcare professions: a systematic review

Author:

Patel Reena,Lane Sophie,C. Dinas PetrosORCID,M. Lahart IanORCID,S. Metsios George

Abstract

Background The objective was to investigate the impact of physical activity (PA) teaching and learning approaches in healthcare professionals (HCPs) education on PA-related knowledge, confidence, and behaviour. Methods Eligible experimental studies investigated the effect of interventions that incorporate PA in to the undergraduate and postgraduate education, and continuous professional development of any HCP (medical doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, etc.) on PA-related outcomes including knowledge, perceptions, and confidence to prescribe PA. Six databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, Medline, and SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception to October 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. A narrative data synthesis was undertaken to assess the overall effectiveness of the reviewed educational interventions: knowledge, perceptions, confidence, attitudes, beliefs, and changes in behaviour/practice. Results A total of 32 studies comprising 3,256 participants fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most frequently employed learning approach in eligible studies was training workshops (n=13), followed by experiential learning (n=4). Half of the studies included knowledge as an outcome (n=16) and 10 studies each included a measure of confidence and changes in behaviour/practice. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n=7), showed no improvement in any measure of knowledge, confidence, or behaviour. Two RCTs reported beneficial effects of experiential learning on confidence and perceived behavioural control. In non-randomised studies, training workshops and didactic input with and without simulated e-learning led to statistical improvements in knowledge, confidence, perceived competence, and attitudes. Discussion Most of the eligible studies lacked an adequate sample size, and, in many cases, there was a high loss to follow up which represents a threat to the internal validity of the studies. We found that a blended approach to teaching and learning supported with experiential or simulated experiences to improve the knowledge, perceived competence, and confidence to prescribe PA.

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3