The Model and Efficacy of Online Nurse-led on the Clinical Outcome of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Komariah MariaORCID,Lele Juan Alessandro Jeremis Maruli NuraORCID,Gunawan Audrey,Adammayanti Keyzha AmartyaORCID,Vighneswara DewaORCID,Sihaloho Karlos BerlusconiORCID,Platini HestiORCID,Maulana SidikORCID,Amirah Shakira,Trixie Joue AbrahamORCID

Abstract

Background: The most frequent consequence for those with diabetes mellitus is diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic ulcer treatment must be done properly and on time. The development of online-based intervention by nurses, such as messaging health, may improve the clinical outcome of diabetic foot ulcers by providing easier access, more convenience, and cost-effectiveness, especially for patients in rural areas. Objective: This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis the models and efficacy of online nurse-led intervention on clinical outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: Randomized Controlled Trials were searched by using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The final inclusion study analyzed and synthesized by tabulation, clusterization, contextual and thematic approach, and assessed risk of bias by using RoB 2.0. The study used Mantel Haenszel method. Results: Five randomized controlled trials with 1399 total number of participants were included. There are three studies with some concerns and two studies with low risk of bias. The nurse-led model for diabetic foot ulcer care consists of phone and web-based that conducted by nurse (community nurses and clinical nurses) and doctor specialists are involved in the service. The meta-analysis for amputation outcome showed that telehealth has more favor amputation number with RR 0.6 (95 % CI 0.43 - 0.84; p = 0.003). For healing wounds and mortality outcome, telehealth with RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.99 - 1.16; p = 0.11) and RR 1.37 (95 % CI 0.78 - 2.40; p =0.28), respectively. Conclusions: Phone and web-based may improve clinical outcome of diabetic foot ulcers in terms of amputation outcome, but standard care still more favor in higher wound healing outcome and significantly lower mortality rate.

Funder

Universitas Padjadjaran

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3