Simple models for neuroscience research discoveries: how often are these models used in Africa?

Author:

Hamidu Suleiman Kwairanga,Umar Ahmad,Abdulazeez Rashidat,Muhammad Zaid,Alkhamis Abdulrahman Idris,Umar Mohammed,Ladan Ahmad Aliyu,Nasr Fayza Eid,Ahmad Aisha,Musa Sunday AbrahamORCID,Ya'u Jamilu,Hamman Wilson OliverORCID,Isah Murtala Bindawa,Bello Sanusi Muhammad,Yoshimatsu Takeshi,Issa Sabi Raouf,Bukar Maina MahmoudORCID

Abstract

Background: Simple animal model systems such as Drosophila, Caenorhabditis Elegans and Zebrafish have enabled numerous breakthroughs in understanding human health and disease. Owing to their cheap maintenance cost, adopting these model systems will improve research in Africa. However, the extent to which these models are used across Africa is unknown. This study aimed to identify how often these models are used in Africa. Methods: We downloaded all the PUBMED-indexed publications from the year 2000 to 2021 that have an African affiliation and have mentioned Drosophila, C. elegans or Zebrafish. We manually curated the information on the experimental use of these model systems, author affiliations and details of funding from research publications. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the major hotspots for the use of the model systems and funders, and the pattern of local and international collaborations.   Results: Of the 1851 publications in which at least one of the models was mentioned, only 168 used at least one for the actual investigation. With an average of 21 articles per country, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia contributed 75% of these studies. The remaining 25% were contributed by seven other countries. Analysis of funding information revealed that 24.4% of the studies were exclusively locally funded, 28.57% exclusively internationally funded, 15.5% received both local and international funding, and the rest (31.5%) were unfunded, revealing that there is satisfactory access to funds for simple animal model studies, especially from external funders. By analysing the pattern of collaborations, we show that collaborations with researchers from other continents predominate over intra-Africa collbaorations. Conclusions: Our work provides data on the current state of research using simple model systems in African laboratories and argues that incorporating these models will advance biomedical science research in Africa.

Funder

Alzheimer's Association

Wellcome Trust

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative

Yobe State University, Nigeria

Yobe State Government of Nigeria

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Reference39 articles.

1. African Genetic Diversity: Implications for Human Demographic History, Modern Human Origins, and Complex Disease Mapping.;M Campbell;Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet.,2008

2. What is next in African neuroscience?;K Donald;elife.,2022

3. Investing in health Ramp;D: where we are, what limits us, and how to make progress in Africa.;V Simpkin;BMJ Glob Health.,2019

4. Africa generates less than 1% of the world’s research; data analytics can change that.;D Charon;Elsevier Connect.,2018

5. Challenges facing young African scientists in their research careers: A qualitative exploratory study.;S Kumwenda;Malawi Med J.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3