THE DIFFICULTIES OF BUILDING UP A NEW PARADIGM OF WORKING ORGANIZATION IN SCHOOLS

Author:

Gather Thurler Monica1,Maulini Olivier1

Affiliation:

1. University of Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

With the stated aim of reducing inequities in the access to knowledge, most school systems have been reviewing and standardizing their curricula, emphasizing inclusion, strengthening school autonomy and parental involvement, introducing tertiary training of teachers and principals, and increasing institutional initiatives aiming to enhance teaching effectiveness. This contribution argues on behalf of empirical evidence, obtained by the observation of teachers’ and school practices which has been conducted during by the Geneva Research Laboratory, that these sorts of change strategies will not produce the desired impact unless they are combined with specific innovative actions aiming at a) thorough reorganization of work in schools, and (b) making actors and citizens change their attitudes concerning the possible ways of encouraging pupils to learn. The conclusion insists on the need to give professionals the opportunity to thoroughly reconsider the means by which they will be able to move on from bureaucratically founded, rigid and locked in towards a flexible working organization. This change strategy includes reflection on the principles of organization that guide teaching activities and/or on the new learning settings, which make possible new ways of learning. Key words: change strategies, conditions for learning, imagination, implementation, innovation, knowledge development, learning issues, limited rationality, work organization.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference44 articles.

1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

2. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education Policy and Social Class. London: Routledge.

3. Bandura, A. (2011). Social Cognitive Theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychological Theories (pp. 349-373). London: Sage.

4. Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

5. Blais, M. C., Gauchet, M., & Ottavi, D. (2008). Conditions de l'éducation. Paris: Stock.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3