Affiliation:
1. Hangzhou Normal University, China
2. Hangzhou Yuhang Xianlin Middle School, China
Abstract
This paper proposes a blended teaching design model on WeChat Platform-based SPOC and carries out an empirical study of its applicability and effectiveness in lower-secondary school science teaching. Participants were from two eighth grade classes with different academic performance, and after conducting the same blended teaching, it was found that pre-class knowledge transmission on the WeChat platform considerably enhanced students’ classroom participation, which was also highly related to their improved post-class test scores. The improvement in the performance of the weak groups is more obvious. In addition, backend data from the WeChat platform revealed that the number of resource clicks was significantly higher than the total number of students, indicating that the sharing function of the WeChat platform facilitated the sharing of educational resources. Seven in-service science teachers were also interviewed to qualitatively evaluate and analyze the teaching model from the perspective of in-service teachers. The comprehensive results indicate that the teaching model constructed in this study achieves good results, facilitates the development of students’ independent learning ability, and allows for the integration of this blended teaching model into lower-secondary curriculum.
Keywords: Blended teaching; Science education; SPOC; Teaching design model; WeChat platform-assisted teaching
Reference58 articles.
1. Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in massive open online courses. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13, 207-216. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062116.pdf
2. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf
3. Ashton, J., & Elliott, R. (2007). Juggling the balls—Study, work, family and play: student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930701321378
4. Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835768
5. Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2889-2900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9748-9