CLOSING THE SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS GAP BETWEEN STUDENTS WITH HIGH AND LOW LEVEL ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Author:

Prayitno Baskoro Adi1,Corebima Duran2,Susilo Herawati2,Zubaidah Siti2,Ramli Murni1

Affiliation:

1. Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

2. State University of Malang, Indonesia

Abstract

Science Process Skills (SPSs) are fundamental skills to mastering science. To nurture students' SPS, inquiry based learning and student-center activities may work effectively. This study aims at analyzing: How Inquiry-based Learning and Student Team Achievement Division (INSTAD) affects science process skills compared with inquiry-based learning, Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD), and conventional learning method. The participants were 136 grade 7 students from 27 public middle schools in Surakarta, Indonesia. They were divided into 68 students with higher academic (HA) achievement and 68 students with lower academic (LA) achievement. A nonequivalent control group design with pretest and posttest were applied to get data on SPSs using a sort of essay test. The result indicates that: (1) While the outcomes of INSTAD and inquiry-based learning are comparable, they are significantly different compared with the outcomes of STAD and conventional learning. (2) Students in HA group have higher SPS than students in LA groups. (3) INSTAD, on an equal level with inquiry-based learning, significantly increases the students’ SPSs. Compared with other three methods, INSTAD was confirmed the most effective in closing the science process skills gaps between students in HA group and LA group. Keywords: inquiry-based learning, INSTAD, STAD, science process skills.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference39 articles.

1. Adesoji, F. A., & Ibraheem, T. L. (2009). Effects of student teams-achievement divisions strategy and mathematics knowledge on learning outcomes in chemical kinetics. The Journal of International Social Research, 2 (6), 15–25. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt2/sayi6pdf/adesoji_ibraheem.pdf.

2. Adey, P. (1999). The science of thinking, and science for thinking: A description of cognitive acceleration through science education (CASE). Geneva: The International Bureau of Education. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED442622.

3. Ambarsari, W., Santosa, S., & Maridi. (2013). Penerapan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains dasar pada pelajaran biologi siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta [The implementation of guided inquiry on biology to improve scientific process skills of students grade 8th of Junior High School 7 Surakarta]. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5 (1), 81–95. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/bio/article/view/1441.

4. Bilgin, I. (2009). The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students’ achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction. Scientific Research and Essay, 4 (10), 1038–1046. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1380559513_Bilgin.pdf.

5. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of proximal development. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3 (2), 1–19. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f6d6/22f55f17daf2d66e51282d17c0e00a350155.pdf.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3