Highly purified-hMG versus rFSH in ovarian hyperstimulation in women undergoing elective fertility preservation

Author:

Israeli Tal,Samara Nivin,Barda Shimi,Groutz Asnat,Azem Foad,Amir Hadar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center,

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To compare recombinant FSH (rFSH) with highly purified-human menopausal gonadotrophin (hp-hMG) on ovarian response in women undergoing elective fertility preservation (FP). Methods: This retrospective study included 456 women who underwent elective FP with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols between 01/2017-12/2021. Three-hundred and forty-one women were stimulated with rFSH and 115 with hp-hMG, and the ovarian stimulation outcomes were compared between the two groups. A multivariate linear regression analysis assessed the impact of age, basal FSH level, antral follicle count, and protocol type on the ovarian stimulation outcomes. Results: Women in the rFSH group were significantly younger, and their antral follicle count was significantly higher than those in the hp-hMG group (35.50±2.12 vs. 35.99±2.13 years, P = 0.034 and 13.76±6.08 vs. 11.84±6.06, P = 0.002). There were no significant group differences in the amount (P = 0.645) and duration (P = 0.265) of FSH stimulation. The peak estradiol level was significantly lower for the rFSH group compared to the hp-hMG group (2547.18±1648.21 pg/mL vs. 3468.02±2497.69 pg/mL, P < 0.001), while peak progesterone level was significantly higher (1.33±0.75 ng/mL vs. 1.01±0.52 ng/mL, P = 0.001). The numbers of retrieved and MII oocytes were significantly higher for the rFSH group compared with the hp-hMG group (16.82±10.95 vs. 13.25±9.66, P = 0.02, and 13.22±9.13 vs. 9.76±7.11, P = 0.005), while the maturity rates were comparable (P = 0.103). Conclusion: rFSH was demonstrated to have superior oocyte yield compared to hp-hMG in ovarian hyperstimulation for women undergoing elective FP.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3