Tailored versus conventional surgical debridement in complex facial lacerations in emergency department: a retrospective study

Author:

Park Byeong Kwon1,Min Jin Hong2,Park Jung Soo2,You Yeon Ho1,Jeong Won Joon2,Cho Yong Chul1,Oh Se Kwang2,In Yong Nam2,Ahn Hong Joon2,Kang Chang Shin1,Kyung Hyun woo2,Kim Joo Hak3,Yang Ho Jik3,Lee Byung Kook4,Yoo Heon Jong2

Affiliation:

1. Chungnam National University Hospital

2. Chungnam National University

3. Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital

4. Chonnam National University

Abstract

Abstract Background Surgical debridement is usually an essential step in treating complex facial lacerations (CFL). As the severity of CFL increases, conventional surgical debridement (CSD) of wound edges becomes difficult and may be insufficient to remove damaged tissues and create clean edges. Because the severity and shape of CFL are diverse and different, it is necessary to tailor the customized pre-excisional design, the tailored surgical debridement (TSD), for each case before performing surgical debridement. Applying TSD is expected to enable effective debridement in CFL with higher severity. This study compared cosmetic outcomes and complication incidence of CSD and TSD, according to CFL severity. Methods This was a retrospective observational study. Eligible patients with CFL who visited the emergency department between August 2020 and December 2021 were examined. CFL severity was graded to Grades I and II. CSD and TSD outcomes were compared using the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale. Furthermore, a good cosmetic outcome was defined as a SCAR score of ≤ 2. The percentage of good cosmetic outcome between the two groups was compared. The SCAR score and percentage of good cosmetic outcomes between the two groups were compared overall and by severity. For comparison of complication incidence, asymmetry, infection, and dehiscence incidence were compared. Results In total, 252 patients were enrolled (121 [48.0%] CSD and 131 [52.0%] TSD). In CSD and TSD groups, the median SCAR scores were 3 (1–5) and 1 (0–2) in all enrolled patients (p < 0.001), 2 (0–4) and 1 (0–1) in Grade I (p < 0.01), and 5 (4–6) and 1 (1–2) in Grade II (p < 0.001). The good cosmetic outcomes were 46.3% and 84.0% overall (p < 0.001), 59.6% and 85.0% in Grade I (p < 0.01), and 9.4% and 83.5% in Grade II (p < 0.001) for CSD and TSD. The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the CSD than in the TSD groups, but this was limited to asymmetry. There was no statistical difference in both infection and dehiscence. Conclusion TSD can lead to an objectively good cosmetic prognosis at higher CFL severity than CSD and can reduce the occurrence of facial asymmetry.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. Analysis of patients with facial lacerations repaired in the emergency room of a provincial hospital;Lee JH;Arch Plast Surg,2015

2. Current management of acute cutaneous wounds;Singer AJ;N Engl J Med.,2008

3. Scar revision;Sharma M;Indian J Plast Surg,2013

4. Updates in emergency department laceration management;Otterness K;Clin Exp Emerg Med,2019

5. Motola I, Sullivan JE. General principles of wound management. Reichman EF (Ed.), Reichman's emergency medicine procedures, 3ed. McGraw Hill. 2018. https://accessemergencymedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=2498§ionid=201294437. Accessed 20 October 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3