Affiliation:
1. The University of Iowa
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: Individual level or personal “responsibility” is often implicitly or explicitly used to improve sexual health outcomes. Rural women face unique contextual barriers that increase their risk for poorer sexual health. Therefore, the objective of this study was to understand how rural Iowa women define responsible sexual behavior (RSB) and to identify what contextual variables influence these women’s ability to enact their definitions.
Study Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative descriptive study used a semi-structured interview guide to conduct telephone interviews with rural women living in non-core Iowa counties who have had (or planned to have) sex with men. Data were analyzed using within and across case analysis to produce defining and enacting themes of responsible sexual behavior.
Results: Ten women from eight Iowa counties completed telephone interviews. For rural women in this sample, RSB was defined as understanding the consequences of sex and taking action to manage risks by using contraception or abstinence, “knowing” your partner, and seeking knowledge and resources. The rural context influenced how participants acquired information and created barriers to enacting responsible sexual behavior.
Conclusion: Rural women’s definition of responsible sexual behavior did not align with rural values about sexuality. As a result, women often relied on informal information and resources. Emphasizing community-level interventions that act on contextual influences over individual approaches may further assist rural women in enacting responsible sexual behavior.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. American College Health Association. (n.d.). Student objectives. Retrieved from https://www.acha.org/HealthyCampus/HealthyCampus/Stude nt_Objectives.aspx
2. Ayres, L., Kavanaugh, K., & Knafl, K. A. (2003). Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303013006008
3. Bellamy, G. R., Bolin, J. N., & Gamm, L. D. (2011). Rural Healthy People 2010, 2020, and beyond: the need goes on. Family and Community Health, 34(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31820dea1c
4. Bureau, F. a. Y. S. (2020). State Personal Responsibility Education Program Fact Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/fysb/fact-sheet/state-personal-responsibility-education-program
5. Dillon, M. & Savage, S. (2006). Values and religion in rural America: Attitudes toward abortion and same-sex relations. Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire. https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=carsey