Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
2. Key Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, School of kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
3. College of Biomedical Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common, but traditional examinations primarily focus on static assessments, lacking the ability to evaluate dynamic knee stability. Therefore, a dynamic knee function scoring system is needed.
Purpose: This study aimed to propose a dynamic scoring system based on a large sample of normative six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) gait kinematics and validate its correlation with conventional outcome measurements when assessing ACL-injured knees.
Methods: A total of 500 healthy Chinese participants were recruited to establish a large dataset. 83 patients with isolated unilateral ACL injury were included for preoperative assessments. An infrared navigation three-dimensional portable knee motion analysis system was used to collect data on the 6-DOF of both knees while walking on a treadmill. A novel 6-DOF scoring system was developed based on the large sample data using the dynamic time warping algorithm. The Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated between the 6-DOF score and the Lysholm score, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and Tegner’s activity scale.
Results: The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for abduction/adduction, internal/external rotation, flexion/extension, anterior/posterior translation, medial/lateral translation, and proximal/distal translation in the 500 healthy participants were as follows: 10.07 ± 4.04°, 15.13 ± 4.85°, 60.56 ± 6.07°, 1.79 ± 0.75 cm, 1.09 ± 0.42 cm, and 1.58 ± 0.54 cm, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) between the 6-DOF score and the assessment scores were as follows: ρ = 0.375 (p < 0.001) for the Lysholm score, ρ = 0.273 (p = 0.016) for Tegner’s activity scale, and ρ = 0.145 (p = 0.208) for the 2000 IKDC subjective score.
Conclusion: Significant correlations were found between the 6-DOF score and the Lysholm score as well as Tegner’s activity scale. Therefore, the 6-DOF score has the potential to provide comprehensive and meaningful information on the dynamic knee function and stability of ACL-injured patients.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC