Maternal-Infant Outcome Analysis of Live Births from Painless Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproductive Technology

Author:

Gao Pingping1,Hu Xuyan1,Xia Leizhen1,Chen Junmin1,Zhang Xuehong2,Xu Dingfei1,Tian Lifeng1,Huang Jialyu1

Affiliation:

1. Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital

2. Nanchang County People's Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the maternal-infant outcomes of live births resulting from painless oocyte retrieval within assisted reproductive technology (ART). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of clinical data from patients who achieved live births through in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from September 2021 to May 2023. The study included 5,806 cycles of fresh embryo transfers during the early follicular phase prolonged protocol. Propensity score matching yielded 1,563 cases in both the painless oocyte retrieval group and the control group. Univariate analysis was utilized to assess differences in basic clinical data, maternal complications, and neonatal birth outcomes. Results: There was no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of oocyte retrieval numbers, fertilization methods, matured ICSI oocytes, normal fertilized oocytes, normal cleavage oocytes, high-quality embryos, transferable embryos, ICSI oocyte maturation rates, normal fertilization rates, normal cleavage rates, high-quality embryo rates, transplantable blastocyst formation rates, rates of non-transplantable embryos, and fresh embryo transfer rates (all P>0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the number of embryos transferred, types of embryos transplanted, the presence of at least one high-quality embryo during transplantation, HCG positive rates, biochemical abortion rates, embryo implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, abortion rates, live birth rates, single fetus rates, and multiple pregnancy rates between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). There were also no significant differences in gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, placental abnormalities, polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, cesarean section rates, and premature rupture of membranes between the groups (all P>0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of single live births larger than gestational age (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in sex distribution, preterm and very preterm birth rates, postmature birth rates, proportions of low birth weight, very low birth weight, giant infants, incidences of small for gestational age, and birth defects between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: The use of propofol in painless oocyte retrieval does not impact the fertilization of oocytes, follicular maturation, cleavage, or clinical pregnancy rates, nor does it increase the risk of maternal complications or birth defects in live births. Therefore, painless oocyte retrieval is considered relatively safe.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference17 articles.

1. and infertility:definition and epidemiology[J];VANDERBORGHT M,WYNS C.Fertility;Clin Biochem 2018

2. The effect of the anaesthetic, Propofol, on in-vitrooocyte maturation,fertilization and cleavage inmice;Alsalili M;HumReprod,1997

3. An evaluationof propofol toxicity on mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos;Tatone C;Hum Reprod,1998

4. Dershwitz M. Intravenous and Inhalation Anesthetics. In: William HE, editor. Clinical Anesthesia Procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippinkott Williams and Wilkins; 2002. pp. 156–8.

5. Propofol anaesthesia for ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval: accumulation of the anaesthetic agent in follicular fluid;Coetsier T;Hum Reprod,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3