Whole stomach versus narrow gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (ATHLETE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Author:

Kitadani Junya1ORCID,Hayata Keiji2,Goda Taro2,Tominaga Shinta2,Fukuda Naoki2,Nakai Tomoki2,Nagano Shotaro2,Ojima Toshiyasu2,Shimokawa Toshio2,Kawai Manabu2

Affiliation:

1. Wakayama Medical University - Kimiidera Campus: Wakayama Kenritsu Ika Daigaku

2. Wakayama Medical University: Wakayama Kenritsu Ika Daigaku

Abstract

Abstract

Background There are two types of methods of creating a gastric conduit after esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: narrow gastric tube reconstruction or whole stomach reconstruction. Whole stomach reconstruction with good blood perfusion was reported in a prospective cohort study to be safe and that it has the possibility to prevent anastomotic leakage (AL). We therefore planned a randomized controlled phase III study to investigate the superiority of whole stomach reconstruction over narrow gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods This is a single center, two-arm, open-label, randomized phase III trial. We calculated that 65 patients in each arm of this study and total study population of 130 patients are required according to our historical data on narrow gastric tube reconstruction and prospective data on whole stomach reconstruction. In the narrow gastric tube group, a 3.5-cm-wide gastric tube is made along the greater curvature of the stomach using linear staplers. Otherwise, in the whole stomach group, after the lymphadenectomy of the lesser curvature and No.2, the stomach is cut just below the esophagogastric junction using a linear stapler. The primary endpoint of this study is the incidence of AL. Secondary endpoints are the occurrence rate of anastomotic stenosis, the occurrence rate of pneumonia, the occurrence rate of all postoperative complications, the occurrence rate of reflux esophagitis, quality of life evaluation by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC OES-18, nutritional evaluation, the amount of blood loss, postoperative hospital stays and blood flow evaluation. Complications are evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification (Version 2.0), and those of Grade II or higher are considered to be postoperative complications. Discussion If the optimal method for creating a gastric conduit after esophagectomy is clarified, it may be possible to contribute to improving short-term and long-term surgical outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Trial registration: The protocol of ATHLETE trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000050677 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm). Date of Registration: March 26, 2023. Date of First Participant Enrollment: March 27, 2023.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3