Barriers to the Incorporation of Digital Health Competencies in the Medical School Curriculum: A Qualitative Study of Doctors in Organizational Leadership

Author:

Zainal Humairah1,Xin Xiao Hui1,Thumboo Julian1,Fong Kok Yong1

Affiliation:

1. Singapore General Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Digital technologies have influenced healthcare delivery worldwide and are increasingly being used in clinical practice. However, studies have shown a lag in the implementation of guidelines for the training of digital health competencies (DHC) in medical schools. Furthermore, few existing frameworks on DHC have examined barriers commonly faced by developed countries to equip medical students with DHC. Using Singapore as a case study, and by exploring the perspectives of doctors in organizational leadership positions, this paper identifies reasons for this lag and a common framework that can help overcome these barriers. Methods Findings were drawn from individual semi-structured interviews with 33 doctors in executive and organizational leadership roles. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were interpreted using qualitative thematic analysis. Results Participants were currently (n = 26) or formerly (n = 7) in organizational leadership. They highlighted six reasons for the lag in DHC integration in the curricula: bureaucratic inertia, expectations to pursue traditional career pathways, lack of protective mechanisms for experiential learning and experimentation, lack of clear policy guidelines for clinical practice, need for more evidences on the effectiveness of digital technologies, and need for a strong and integrated IT infrastructure in healthcare institutions. Conclusions Applying Damschroder et al.’s (2009) Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) would illuminate the importance of considering both structural and institutional barriers to training students with relevant DHC. Showing how relevant CFIR constructs might be applied to integrating DHC in the medical school curriculum would help ensure consistency of implementation across time and contexts.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3