Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Author:

Yoon Hyunseok1,Shin Yeokyeong1,Ryoo Baek-Yeol1,Jeong Hyehyun1,Park Inkeun1,Seo Dong-Wan1,Lee Sang Soo1,Park Do Hyun1,Song Tae Jun1,Oh Dongwook1,Hwang Dae Wook1,Lee Jae Hoon1,Song Ki Byung1,Park Yejong1,Kwak Bong Jun1,Hong Seung-Mo1,Park Jin-hong1,Kim Song Cheol1,Kim Kyu-pyo1,Yoo Changhoon1

Affiliation:

1. Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX. Methods Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this single-center retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed. Results With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3–47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX—locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy. Conclusions The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and key clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. "Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Switch in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.";Alva-Ruiz R;Ann Surg Oncol,2022

2. "Second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: Which is the best option?";Aprile G;Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2017

3. "Neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced unresectable (LAPC) and borderline resectable (BRPC) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.";Blazer M;Ann Surg Oncol,2015

4. "FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.";Conroy T;New England Journal of Medicine,2011

5. "Systematic review and meta-analysis of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer.";Jesus VHF;Ther Adv Med Oncol,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3