Affiliation:
1. Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences
2. Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine
3. Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine Istanbul
4. Istanbul University
5. Maslak Acibadem Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
To reveal whether chemoradiotherapy-consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT) treatment provides more organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and its effect on oncological outcomes.
Method
Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database was performed. Oncological outcomes of mid-low LARC patients (n = 60) were analyzed after a follow-up of 63 (50–83) months. Patients with clinical complete response (cCR) were treated with the watch-and-wait (WW) protocol. Patients who could not achieve cCR were treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) or local excision (LE).
Results
Thirty-nine (65%) patients who achieved cCR were treated with the WW protocol. TME was performed in 15 (25%) patients and LE was performed in 6 (10%) patients. During the follow-up period, 10 (25.6%) patients in the WW group had regrowth (RG) and 3 (7.6%) had distant metastasis (DM). 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 90.1% and 71.6%, respectively, in WW group. 5-y OS and DFS were 94.9% (95% CI: 88–100%) and 80% (95% CI: 55.2–100%), respectively, in the RG group. 5-y OS and DFS were 90.1% (95% CI: 78.9–100%) and 96.6% (95% CI: 89.9–100%) in the non-RG group. 5-y OS and DFS were 78% (95% CI: 55.8–100%) and 60% (95% CI: 35.2–84.8%) in TME group.
Conclusion
CRT-CNCT provides cCR as high as 2/3 of LARC patients. While the WW protocol provides organ preservation, RGs developed during follow-up can be successfully salvaged without causing oncological disadvantage.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC