A qualitative exploration of women’s expectations of birth and knowledge of birth interventions following antenatal education

Author:

Davies Anna1,Larkin Michael2,Willis Lucy1,Mampitiya Narendra1,Lynch Mary1,Toolan Miriam1,Fraser Abigail1,Rawling Kate1,Plachcinski Rachel3,Barnfield Sonia4,Smith Margaret4,Burden Christy1,Merriel Abi1

Affiliation:

1. University of Bristol

2. Aston University

3. National Childbirth Trust

4. North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background Expectations of birth, and whether they are met, influence postnatal psychological wellbeing. Intrapartum interventions, for example induction, are increasing due to a changing pregnant population and evolving evidence, which may contribute to a mismatch between expectations and birth experience. NICE recommends antenatal education (ANE) to prepare women for labour and birth, but there is no mandated NHS ANE curriculum. We aimed to explore women’s expectations of childbirth and their understanding of common interventions and complications following NHS and non-NHS ANE. Method Qualitative focus groups were conducted with postnatal women (< 12 months postpartum) aged ≥ 16, who had received antenatal care at a single NHS Trust. A semi-structured topic guide was used to explore birth expectations following attendance at ANE and knowledge of birth interventions and complications. Data were transcribed and thematic analysis was undertaken by at least two researchers. Results 46 women (mean age: 33.5years; 81% white British) participated across eight groups. Sixty-five percent were primiparous, 35% had a caesarean birth. Fifty percent attended NHS ANE and 59% non-NHS ANE. Participants perceived that a ‘hierarchy of birth’ was presented within ANE classes, where a ‘better birth’ involved vaginal birth, minimal pain relief and limited intervention. Participants described expectations of control and choice over their birth, though some described being encouraged to be open-minded about the course it may take. Participants identified a mismatch between their expectations and subsequent experiences, which adversely impacted their psychological wellbeing. While participants received information about common birth interventions and complications, limited time spent on these during classes resulted in expectations that they were rare. Participants felt that receiving sensitively presented information about the frequency of interventions could prepare women and support their psychological wellbeing after birth. Conclusions Women’s expectations of birth are informed by ANE which may precipitate a mismatch between expectations and experience. Better information about risk factors and frequency of labour and birth interventions may support women to develop evidence-informed expectations of birth, reducing the expectation-experience gap, with consequent impact on maternal postnatal wellbeing. A mandatory minimum curriculum for ANE is needed to ensure high-quality education is available to all.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3