Unraveling the Lack of Correlation between RBP4 and MASLD: Insights from Gene Expression and Serum Level Analysis
Author:
Bertran Laia1, Aguilar Carmen1, Auguet Teresa2, Richart Cristóbal1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Rovira i Virgili University (URV), 43201 Reus, Spain 2. Joan XXIII University Hospital, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Although previous evidence supports the involvement of retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), there are conflicting reports. Our aim was to evaluate the role of RBP4 in MASLD among a homogeneous cohort of women with morbid obesity (MO). We recruited 180 women with MO, including 40 with normal liver (NL), 40 with simple steatosis (SS), and 100 with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Serum levels of RBP4 were analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RBP4 hepatic mRNA expression was evaluated by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction. In this sense, we did not report significant differences in RBP4 circulating levels between hepatic histological groups. However, analyzing RBP4 hepatic mRNA expression, we observed decreased expression of RBP4 in MASH subjects compared to those with NL or SS. To conclude, in a homogeneous and sizeable cohort of women with MO and MASLD, our findings limit, contrary to previous proposals, the key role of RBP4 in relation to MASLD and MASH pathogenesis. Therefore, new studies are necessary in other study groups to validate the absence of this correlation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Chan W-K, Chuah K-H, Rajaram RB, Lim L-L, Ratnasingam J, Vethakkan SR (2023) ‘Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A State-of-the-Art Review’, Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 197–213, Sep. 10.7570/jomes23052 2. Le MH et al (2022) Dec., ‘2019 Global NAFLD Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis’, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2809–2817.e28, 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.002 3. Dulai PS et al (2017) May., ‘Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis’, Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1557–1565, 10.1002/hep.29085 4. Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R (2015) ‘Fibrosis Progression in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver vs Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Paired-Biopsy Studies’, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 643–654.e9, Apr. 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.014 5. Karuthan SR, Koh PS, Chinna K, Chan WK (2021) ‘Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer and Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging systems for prediction of survival among Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients’, Med J Malaysia, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 199–204, Mar
|
|