Comparison of nomogram with machine learning techniques for prediction of overall survival in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma

Author:

Wang Peng1,Xie Mingjie1,Wang Xingchao1,Yu Jiawei1,Chen Erlin1,Zhou Zhou1,Niu Yuanjie1,Song Wei1,Ni Qingfeng1,Zhu Jianwei1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nantong University Affiliated Hospital: Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

Abstract

Abstract Background Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RP-LPS) is a rare and overlooked tumor type. Because of the rarity and diversity RP-LPS histological subtypes, the diagnosis, treatment and prediction of survival, pose great challenges. This study compared the performance of the 8th edition TNM model, nomogram, and machine learning algorithms in predicting overall survival in patients with RP-LPS to establish a more effective predictive model for clinical use. Establishing relatively reliable survival prediction models has important implications for planning personalized care and patient counseling. Methods The dataset used included clinical data of 2,147 patients with RP-LPS. The machine learning algorithms evaluated included support vector machine, adaptive boosting, decision tree and random forest. These algorithms were evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and accuracy values. The performance of the algorithm that produced the optimal results was compared with the 8th edition TNM model and nomogram to better predict overall survival in patients with RP-LPS. Results Comparison of prediction performance indicators of each machine learning algorithm, including accuracy, AUC, F1 score, etc., revealed that the adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) algorithm produced the best prediction effect (accuracy = 69.1%, AUC = 0.70). The performance indicators of AdaBoost were further compared with the traditional TNM model and the nomogram model, and the machine learning algorithm performance was considerably better than other types of models. Conclusions The machine learning algorithm AdaBoost provides more personalized and reliable prognostic information of RP-LPS than the nomogram. However, the level of transparency offered by the nomogram in estimating patient outcomes is higher, which strengthened the principle of shared decision making between the patient and clinician. Therefore, a combination of a nomogram–machine learning (NomoML) predictive model may help to improve care, provide information to patients, and facilitate clinicians in making RP-LPS management-related decisions.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3