Natural History Study of Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Wounds and Patient Reported Outcomes Using Mobile Application Home Photography

Author:

Fulchand Shivali1,Nazaroff Jaron2ORCID,Harris Nicki1,So Jodi1,Eid Edward1,Li Shufeng1,Lu Ying1,Tang Jean1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Stanford University School of Medicine

2. Stanford University

Abstract

Abstract Background: Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare, blistering genetic disease where wounding and wound pain are the most commonly reported problems by patients. The natural history of RDEB wounds has not been prospectively studied, thus limiting the design of clinical trial endpoints. Objective: To determine differences in spontaneous wound closure between chronic open vs recurrent RDEB wounds. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in which participants used a mobile application to upload weekly photographs of multiple target wounds for up to 6 months and reported associated wound pain and itch (Photo Cohort). We also utilized a separate dataset of placebo-treated wounds from a previously completed trial (Validation Cohort) to validate the differences in characteristics and spontaneous closure rates between chronic open vs recurrent wounds. 13 RDEB participants from a single academic center were enrolled in the prospective Photo Cohort while data from 57 trial participants was leveraged in the Validation Cohort . Results: For the Photo Cohort, 734 photos were collected from 69 wounds, of which 42 (73.7%) were chronic open wounds. Chronic open wounds were larger, more painful, and much less likely to experience spontaneous wound closure (17% vs 100% P<0.001) with much higher time-to-closure (25.7 weeks vs. 5.7 weeks, P<0.0001) than recurrent wounds during follow-up. Baseline wound size was the sole predictor of spontaneous wound closure in the Photo Cohort (12.8, 95% CI: 3.3-48, P<0.01., Findings in the Validation Cohort recapitulated those in the Photo Cohort (26% chronic open wounds had spontaneous closure vs 86% recurrent wounds, P<0.001, and time-to-closure of 14.6 weeks vs. 8 weeks for recurrent wounds). In multivariable models, wounds of the recurrent type had a 29-fold greater likelihood to close spontaneously compared with chronic open wound type (P=0.0045). Conclusions: Chronic open wounds tend to be larger, more painful, have a much lower probability of spontaneous closure, and longer time-to-closure than recurrent wounds. The distinction between wound types can be leveraged to predict spontaneous wound closure and guide wound selection and observation in RDEB clinical trials.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3