Determinants of immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients: an Italian observational study (the CESIT project)

Author:

Rosa Alessandro C.1,Finocchietti Marco1,Agabiti Nera1,Menè Paolo2,Bracaccia Maria Elena2,Bellini Arianna1,Massari Marco3,Alegiani Stefania Spila3,Masiero Lucia4,Bedeschi Gaia4,Cardillo Massimo4,Lucenteforte Ersilia5,Piccolo Giuseppe6,Leoni Olivia7,Ferroni Eliana8,Pierobon Silvia8,Nordio Maurizio8,Ledda Stefano9,Garau Donatella9,Davoli Marina1,Addis Antonio1,Belleudi Valeria1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy

2. University of Rome La Sapienza, Sant'Andrea University Hospital

3. Istituto Superiore Di Sanità

4. Italian National Transplant Centre, Istituto Superiore di Sanità

5. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa

6. Regional Transplant Coordination, Lombardy Region

7. Department of Health of Lombardy Region, Epidemiology Observatory

8. Azienda Zero of the Veneto Region

9. General Directorate for Health

Abstract

Abstract Background Very scanty evidence is available on factors influencing the choice of immunosuppressive drug therapy after kidney transplantation. Methods. An Italian multiregional real-world study was conducted integrating national transplant information system and claims data. All patients undergoing kidney transplantation for the first time during 2009–2019 (incident patients) were considered. Multilevel logistic models were used to estimate Odds Ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% Confidence intervals. Factors with statistically significance were identified as characteristics associated with treatment regimens: cyclosporin-CsA vs tacrolimus-Tac and, within the latter group, mTOR inhibitors vs mycophenolate-MMF. Results. We identified 3,622 kidney patients undergoing transplantation in 17 hospitals located in 4 Italian regions, 78.3% was treated with TAC-based therapy, of which 78% and 22% in combination with MMF and mTOR, respectively. For both comparison groups, the choice of immunosuppressive regimens was mostly guided by standard hospital practices. Only few recipient and donor characteristics were found associated with specific regimen (donor/receipt age, immunological risk and diabetes). Conclusions. The choice of post-renal transplant immunosuppressive therapyseems to be mostly driven by standard Centre practices, while only partially based on patient’s characteristics and recognized international guidelines.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference14 articles.

1. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary;Kasiske BL;Kidney Int

2. Endorsement of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines on kidney transplantation: a European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement;Heemann U;Nephrol Dial Transplant

3. Immunosuppressive Regimens Following Kidney Transplantation in Five European Countries: The Observational RECORD Study;Arnol M;Transpl Rep,2020

4. Temporal and spatial variability of immunosuppressive therapies in transplant patients: an observational study in italy (publication in press;Marino ML

5. Safety of immunosuppressive drugs used as maintenance therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel);Almeida CC,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3