Step-by-step: A clinical pathway for stepped care management of fear of cancer recurrence– results of a three round online Delphi consensus process with Australian health professionals and researchers

Author:

Smith Allan 'Ben'1,Girgis Afaf2,Taylor Natalie3,Pearce Alison1,Liu Jia4,Shepherd Heather L.5,Wu Verena S.1,Garvey Gail6,Kirsten Laura7,Zakhary Iman8,Ee Carolyn9,Ewald Daniel10,Miller Annie11,Shaw Joanne12

Affiliation:

1. The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW

2. South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW

3. School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW

4. St Vincent's Hospital Sydney

5. Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW

6. The School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, QLD

7. Nepean Cancer Services, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Sydney, NSW

8. Multicultural Services, South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW

9. Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, SA

10. Lennox Head Medical Centre, NSW

11. Cancer Council NSW, NSW

12. School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, The University of Sydney, NSW

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is not routinely addressed in clinical practice, meaning many cancer survivors forego effective interventions. We established expert consensus on a clinical pathway to help health professionals identify and manage FCR. Methods Australian health professionals and researchers working with adult cancer survivors participated in a 3-round Delphi study promoted via oncology professional bodies and social media. The Round 1 online survey presented 38 items regarding FCR screening, triage, assessment, referral, and stepped care, based on a literature review, related pathways/guidelines, and expert input. Participants rated how representative of best-practice items were on a 5-point scale (strongly disagree – strongly agree), with optional qualitative feedback. Consensus was defined as ≥80% of participants strongly/agreeing with items. Items not reaching consensus were re-presented in two subsequent rounds with new items, derived from content analysis of qualitative feedback. Results From 94 participants in Round 1 (89% health professionals) 26/38 (68%) items reached consensus. By round 3, 35/38 (92%) items, including 8 new items, reached consensus. Routine FCR screening and triage conversations, and stepped care management were endorsed. However, timing of FCR screening/triage did not reach consensus. Conclusions This world-first FCR clinical pathway incorporating contemporary evidence and expert opinion recommends routine screening and triage to stepped care management of FCR. Some pathway components, such as screening or triage timing, may need tailoring for different contexts. Implications for Cancer Survivors Implementation of the pathway could aid routine identification and management of FCR, reducing its burden on cancer survivors and the healthcare system.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference52 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3