Affiliation:
1. University of Coimbra
2. Fluminense Federal University
Abstract
Abstract
This study evaluates the hedging effectiveness of TTF and NBP against price volatilities in the Iberian Peninsula's natural gas market (PVB). The methodology includes a comparative analysis of five hedging strategies, including the simple minimum variance approach and the more sophisticated BEKK model, which belongs to the GARCH family. The analysis shows that TTF and NBP serve as efficient hedging instruments, demonstrating in particular their effectiveness as cross-hedging tools in liquidity-constrained markets such as MIBGAS (Iberian Gas Market). In particular, the study finds that simpler models can provide hedge effectiveness comparable to that of more complex models. From a practical point of view, the results advocate that market participants use a mix of hedging strategies and dynamic approaches to manage market volatility. In addition, the study underscores the critical role of regulatory frameworks in fostering market integration and improving liquidity, providing valuable insights for market participants navigating the complexities of natural gas markets.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Cross hedging jet-fuel price exposure”;Adams Z;Energy Economics,2012
2. Renewable energy as a natural gas price hedge: The case of wind”;Berry D;Energy Policy,2005
3. Caporin, M. and McAleer, M. (2012), “Do we really need both BEKK and DCC? A tale of two multivariate GARCH models”, Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Online Library, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 736–751.
4. Crude oil hedging strategies using dynamic multivariate GARCH”;Chang CL;Energy Economics,2011
5. Futures hedging effectiveness under the segmentation of bear/bull energy markets”;Chang CY;Energy Economics,2010