Accuracy of robotic arm-assisted versus computed tomography-based navigation for cup orientation and positioning in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach in supine position

Author:

Okazaki Tomoya1,Imagama Takashi1,Matsuki Yuta1,Tanaka Hiroshi2,Shiigi Eiichi2,Kaneoka Takehiro1,Kawakami Takehiro1,Yamazaki Kazuhiro1,Sakai Takashi1

Affiliation:

1. Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine

2. Yamaguchi Prefectural Grand Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background A robotic arm-assisted and a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system have been reported to improve the accuracy of component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although some previous studies have compared robotic arm-assisted THA (rTHA) with CT-based navigated THA (nTHA), most studies evaluated the outcomes in the lateral position. No study has compared rTHA to nTHA concerning accuracy of cup placement and acetabular fractures using the direct anterior approach (DAA) in supine position. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cup placement and the presence of intraoperative acetabular fractures between rTHA and nTHA using DAA in supine position. Methods We retrospectively investigated 209 hips of 188 patients who underwent rTHA or nTHA using DAA in supine position (rTHA using the Mako system: 85 hips of 79 patients; nTHA: 124 hips of 109 patients). After propensity score matching for age and sex, each group consisted of 73 hips. Postoperative cup orientation and positions measured using a three-dimensional templating software were compared to preoperative planning with CT measurements. Additionally, we investigated the prevalence of occult acetabular fracture. Results The mean absolute error of cup orientation was significant smaller in the rTHA group than in nTHA (inclination: 1.4° ± 1.2° vs 2.7° ± 2.2°, respectively; p = 0.0001, anteversion: 1.5° ± 1.3° vs 2.2° ± 1.7°, respectively; p = 0.007). The cases within an absolute error of 5 degrees in both RI and RA were significantly higher in the rTHA (97.3%) than in nTHA group (82.2%) (p = 0.003). The absolute error of the cup position was not significantly different between the two groups. The prevalence of occult acetabular fracture did not differ significantly between the two groups (rTHA: n = 0 [0%] vs. nTHA: n = 1 [1.4%]). Conclusion Cup placement using DAA in the supine position in rTHA was more accurate with fewer outliers compared to nTHA. Therefore, rTHA performed via DAA in a supine position would be useful for accurate cup placement.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3