Emergency Left Colectomy for Colon Cancer is Not Associated with Worst Oncologic Resection Quality Compared to Elective Surgery

Author:

Hazan Danny1,Ishakov Arkadi1,Levi Sammy1,Shimonov Mordechai1,Dayan Katia1

Affiliation:

1. The Edith Wolfson Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Emergency colectomy of the left colon and sigma carries a higher risk of complication than elective colectomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate our results and to compare the outcome of these two operations. Methods Each patient included in this retrospective analysis underwent laparoscopic or open colectomy for malignant neoplasms with curative intent between 2011 and 2019. Surgical techniques were defined as emergency or elective depending on the timing of the operation, regardless of operational technique. Results A total of 242 patients were recruited, of which 125 had had emergency colectomies. Comparatively, 117 such patients underwent elective colectomies. There were no differences between the groups in factors such as age, gender, demographics and co-morbidities. The main reason for emergency operation included perforation in 105 patients (84%), and obstruction in 20 patients (16%). No difference in the number of lymph nodes harvested (LNH) were found between the 2 groups (mean of 17 LNH, SD +-8). The length of stay (LOH) and time to first flatulence was different between the groups (8.72 +-4.17 days for the elective surgery vs. 19.28+-23.5 days for the emergency surgery for LOH, and 3+-1 days for the elective group Vs. 9+-11.5 days for the emergency group for time to first flatulence, p<0.001 in both). The emergency group exhibited more serious complications (G III IV) than the elective group in the Clavien-Dindo classification. No difference was noted with regards to 30 days' survivals, length of operation and blood loss. Conclusion Our study suggests that the outcome of emergency colectomy of the left colon demonstrated excellent oncologic results compared to that of the elective group. However, emergency operation carries some degree of higher complication rate that need to be taken into account. Best results will be achieved by tailoring each patient’s status with the utilization of the best operation and operative team experience.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. State-by-state variation in emergency versus elective colon resections: room for improvement;Obirieze AC;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2013

2. Current UK practice in emergency laparotomy;Barrow E;Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2013

3. Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study;Marcello PW;Dis Colon Rectum,2001

4. Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes;Ng SS;World J Surg,2008

5. Emergency laparoscopic colectomy: does it measure up to open?;Stulberg JJ;Am J Surg,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3