Affiliation:
1. University of Pittsburgh
2. National Clinician Scholars Program (NCSP), University of Michigan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Over half of critical illness survivors have new or worsened functional impairments. Yet, the United States lacks wide-scale transitional care infrastructure to promote wellbeing and prevent rehospitalization after critical illness. Evidence-based transitional care interventions urgently need to be adapted to address this gap. Thus, as a first step, we engaged diverse stakeholders to describe perspectives on transitional care delivery for critical illness survivors.
Methods
Qualitative content analysis of interviews with 11 critical illness survivors, 11 family caregivers, ten home health providers, nine primary care physicians and one primary care nurse practitioner; and focus groups with two home health teams, seven groups of inpatient providers and one group of administrators (total n = 69). Data collection took place in Western Pennsylvania between February 2020 and March 2022. We used pilot-tested interview guides to elicit perceived care needs, probing for barriers, facilitators, and social determinants of health. Five trained coders analyzed transcripts. We unified codes into themes and checked accuracy and completeness with participants.
Results
All stakeholders perceived that survivors’ unmet needs contributed to incomplete or unsatisfactory transitions. They identified barriers and facilitators of care that mapped easily to evidence-based transitional care intervention models. Social determinants of health were omnipresent factors in post-ICU care delivery. The data generated a hypothesis that strengths-based intervention models which target indicators of wellbeing (rather than deficit-based approaches managing symptoms) will improve outcomes among critical illness survivors. An additional hypothesis is that implementation strategies must design for health equity.
Conclusions
These findings suggest the need to adapt transitional care interventions to better foster wellbeing after critical illness. Six implementation strategies addressing administrative infrastructure and policy relevance (i.e. optimizing: incentives, record systems, quality monitoring, accountability, networking, and funding) could promote wide-scale dissemination of post-ICU transitional care delivery models.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: Report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:502–9.
2. Functional outcomes following critical illness: epidemiology, current management strategies and the future priorities;McPeake J;Curr Opin Crit Care,2021
3. Factors associated with employment outcome after critical illness: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression;Su H;J Adv Nurs,2021
4. Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs;McPeake J;Crit Care Explor,2020
5. Transitions of Care After Critical Illness - Challenges to Recovery and Adaptive Problem Solving∗;Haines KJ;Crit Care Med,2021