Affiliation:
1. Ain Shams University
2. Galala University
3. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Abstract
Abstract
Root perforations may cause periodontitis, resulting in alveolar bone loss. This study compared the zirconia containing MTA Matreva® (MAT group) to traditional MTA Angelus® (ANG group) as root perforation repair materials regarding the cytotoxicity and the osteogenic potential. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) were isolated from two albino rats and cultured. Cytotoxicity of the tested materials was assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay at three-time intervals; 3, 7 and 14 days. The tested materials were used to direct the osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs into osteoblasts. Evaluation of osteogenic effect was performed through assessments of calcium deposition by Alizarin red staining (ARS), expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) ligand (RANKL) protein in BM-MSCs seeded on the tested materials for 14 days and osteogenic potential gene markers expression in BM-MSCs after culture on the tested materials for 14 days. The assessed genes included; tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and interleukin 1-β (IL-1β). All data were statistically analyzed. There were no significant differences between ANG and MAT groups in terms of cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential (P>0.05). The highest level of cell proliferation occurred in MAT groups, followed by ANG group, compared to negative controls (NC). The MAT group showed the highest levels of Average % calcific area fraction (90%) followed by that of ANG group (68%) as compared to NC (48%). The BM-MSCs in the MAT group exhibited significantly highest level of RANKL protein expression, followed by that of ANG group. The ANG group revealed significantly greater TNF-α and IL-1β levels than those in NC. The MAT group had significantly greater value of TGF-β than that of NC. Zirconia containing MTA (MTA Matreva) has comparable cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential to traditional MTA (MTA Angelus), which is regarded a dependable material for root perforation healing.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Root perforations: a review of diagnosis, prognosis and materials;Estrela C;Braz. Oral Res.,2018
2. Immunohistochemical analysis of Biodentine versus MTA in repair of furcation perforation: an animal study;Badr M;G. Ital. Endod.,2023
3. Treatment of experimental furcation perforations with mineral trioxide aggregate, platelet rich plasma or platelet rich fibrin in dogs’ teeth;Tawfik HE;Exp. Toxicol. Pathol.,2016
4. Accidental perforations during root canal treatment: an 8-year nationwide perspective on healthcare malpractice claims;Vehkalahti MM;Clin. Oral Invest.,2020
5. An overview on root perforations: diagnosis, prognosis and management;Mitthra S;Eur. J. Mol. Clin. Med.,2020