A comparative and evaluation of an ELISA on the Q5 recombinant protein for the diagnosis of the canine visceral leishmaniasis, incidence of false-positive results associated with the DPP test.

Author:

Paz Larissa Ferreira de Araújo1,Silva Adalúcia da2,Silva Hemilly Rayanne Ferreira da2,Paiva-Cavalcanti Milena2,de Lima Valéria Marçal Felix3,Beltrão Maria Rosário Oliveira da Cunha4,Silva Maria Beatriz Araújo4,Neto Osvaldo Pompílio de Melo2,Medeiros Zulma Maria2,Santos Wagner José Tenório5

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de Pernambuco

2. Instituto Aggeu Magalhães – Fiocruz

3. Universidade Estadual Paulista

4. Laboratório Central de Pernambuco

5. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation

Abstract

Abstract Background Dogs are considered the major domestic reservoir for the human visceral leishmaniasis, a serious disease caused by the Leishmania infantum parasite. Diagnosis of the canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is critical for disease control, with several methods currently available. Among the serological tests, the DPP rapid test and the EIE-LVC, more commonly used in Brazil, are associated with variable sensitivity and specificity. Research with novel recombinant proteins may therefore improve on the CVL diagnosis, such as the ELISA with the recombinant chimeric protein Q5. This study aimed to compare the Q5 in ELISA with the EIE-LVC (Leishmania major) using a large number ofCVL suspected sera (406) with a previous diagnosis based on the rapid DPP test. Methods Serum samples from dogs CVL positive in the rapid DPP test (n=406) and negative samples from healthy dogs (n=46) were used for ELISA tests using recombinant proteins Q5 and Lci13. The data obtained in the ELISA as well as the correlation with the clinical signs and the Socio-environmental characteristics of the animals were calculated using MedCalc and GraphPad Prism 8.0. Results Overall, similar levels of a lower sensitivity (67-68%) were seen for both the commercial EIE-LVC test and the Q5 ELISA when all assessed sera were considered, but a much greater sensitivity (92%) was seen for those from symptomatic dogs only. In contrast, a large number of negative results were observed for the DPP-positive sera from asymptomatic dogs or those with no clinical information available. A selection of those were tested yet again in new ELISA assays using a second batch of the Q5, purified under milder denaturing conditions, as well as another recombinant protein (Lci13). Conclusions The results reveal a higher-than-expected incidence of false-positive results for DPP, reinforcing the need for other recombinant proteins, such as the chimeric Q5, to be investigated as possible alternatives to the currently used CVL diagnostic methods.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. Changing demographics of visceral leishmaniasis in northeast Brazil: Lessons for the future;Lima ID;PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2018

2. Human visceral leishmaniasis and relationship with vector and canine control measures;Costa DNCC;Rev Saude Publica,2018

3. Geographic distribution and spatial analysis of;Mohebali M;J Vector Borne Dis,2018

4. Current status and management of canine leishmaniasis in Latin America;Marcondes M;Res Vet Sci,2019

5. Advances toward Diagnostic Tools for Managing Zoonotic Visceral Leishmaniasis;Duthie MS;Trends Parasitol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3