Affiliation:
1. North-China University of Water Conservancy and Electric Power: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power
2. CAEP: Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning
3. Central South University
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper 4 types of machine learning models, i.e., Random forest mode, Ridge regression model, Support vector machine model, and Extremely randomized trees model were adopted to predict PM2.5 based on multi-sources data including air quality, and meteorological data in time series. Data were fed into the model by using rolling prediction method which is proven to improve prediction accuracy in our experiments. The comparative experiments show that at the city level, RF and ExtraTrees models have better predictive results and on season level 4 models all have the best prediction performances in winter time and the worst in the summer time and RF model have the best prediction performance with the IA ranging from 0.93 to 0.98, with an MAE of 5.91 to 11.68 ug/m3. Consequently, the demonstration of models’ different performances in each city and each season is expected to shed a light on environmental policy implications.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Time series analysis of air pollution in Bengaluru using ARIMA model;Abhilash M;Ambient Commun Comput Syst Springer:,2018
2. Exposure levels of air pollution (PM2. 5) and associated health risk in Kuwait;Al-Hemoud A;Environ Res,2019
3. Ambient PM2. 5 reduces global and regional life expectancy;Apte JS;Environ Sci Technol Lett,2018
4. Askariyeh MH, Khreis H, Vallamsundar S, Khreis H, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Zietsman J, Ramani T (2020)Elsevier:111–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818122-5.00005-3 (Journal article)
5. Time series analysis and forecasting of air pollution particulate matter (PM 2.5): an SARIMA and factor analysis approach;Bhatti UA;IEEE Access,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献