Is it feasible to nest a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) to evaluate an early years parenting programme? A Born in Bradford’s Better Start study protocol

Author:

Mooney Kate1ORCID,Welch Charlie1,Crossley Kirsty2,Bywater Tracey1,Wright John2,Dickerson Josie2,Blower Sarah1

Affiliation:

1. University of York Department of Health Sciences

2. Bradford Institute for Health Research

Abstract

Abstract Background Evaluating the effectiveness of early years parenting interventions provides evidence to improve the development and wellbeing of children. This protocol paper describes a study to explore the feasibility of evaluating the Incredible Years Toddler early life intervention programme, which is offered to parents of 1–3-year-olds via the Better Start Bradford programme. The study aims to use a Trial Within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) design that randomly selects individuals participating in a cohort to be offered an intervention. The TwiCS information and consent process is person-centred and aims to replicate real world practice whereby only those who are offered the intervention are given information about the intervention. The cohort is the Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) cohort, an interventional birth cohort recruiting expectant parents in three areas of Bradford, UK. The study will assess the feasibility of TwiCS procedures, staged consent, and intervention take-up. Methods We will conduct a feasibility TwiCS to test study procedures. We aim to establish: (1) whether TWiCS methodology can be implemented to create control and intervention arms, while documenting any incidences of contamination within the cohort; (2) whether satisfactory rates of intervention uptake are achieved among participants allocated to the intervention; and (3) whether satisfactory rates of retention of participants in the intervention can be achieved. A RAG rating system has been applied to support the feasibility assessment of each objective: to be rated red (not achieved), amber (partly achieved) and green (achieved). Eligible participants in the BiBBS cohort will be individually randomised 1:1 to the intervention or control arms, with stratification by child age (1 or 2-years-old at the time of randomisation) and ethnicity (White British, South Asian, or other). BiBBS researchers will seek consent from participants randomised to the intervention to pass their contact details onto Incredible Years’ delivery agents. Discussion This feasibility study will inform the utility of the TwiCs approach within an experimental birth cohort to evaluate interventions for infants, toddlers, and their families. Trial registration The study was prospectively registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN16150114).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Tierney AL, Charles A, Nelson I. Brain Development and the Role of Experience in the Early Years. Zero Three [Internet]. 2009 Nov 11 [cited 2023 Mar 10];30(2):9. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3722610/.

2. Hurt L, Paranjothy S, Lucas PJ, Watson D, Mann M, Griffiths LJ et al. Interventions that enhance health services for parents and infants to improve child development and social and emotional well-being in high-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2018 Feb 1 [cited 2022 Nov 21];8(2):e014899. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/2/e014899.

3. Newman L, Judd F, Olsson CA, Castle D, Bousman C, Sheehan P et al. Early origins of mental disorder - risk factors in the perinatal and infant period. BMC Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016;16(1):1–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0982-7.

4. Barlow J, Coren E. The Effectiveness of Parenting Programs. https://doi.org/101177/1049731517725184 [Internet]. 2017 Sep 22 [cited 2022 Dec 20];28(1):99–102. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1049731517725184.

5. Furlong M, McGilloway S, Bywater T, Hutchings J, Smith SM, Donnelly M. Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years. Campbell Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Nov 21];8(1):1–239. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.4073/csr.2012.12.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3