The Missing Voices in the Conscientious Objection Debate: UK Service Users’ Experiences of Conscientious Objection to Abortion.

Abstract

Abstract Background The fourth section of the 1967 Abortion Act states that individuals (including health care practitioners) do not have to participate in an abortion if they have a conscientious objection. A conscientious objection is a refusal to participate in abortion on the grounds of conscience. This may be informed by religious, moral, philosophical, ethical, or personal beliefs. Currently, there is very little investigation into the impact of conscientious objection on service users in the UK. The perspectives of service users are imperative in understanding the real-world consequences and potential impact of conscientious objection and should be considered when creating policies and guidelines. This research provided a platform for women and those who can become pregnant to share their experiences and opinions at a time when these voices are largely excluded in the great tradition of western political philosophy and law-making processes.Method Five service users were interviewed using a narrative interview approach to uncover their abortion journeys and experiences of conscientious objection.Results Doctors are not always informing service users of their right to an abortion, giving service users enough information to access abortion (indirect referral), treating them non-judgmentally, and providing medically correct information. Service users did not experience burdens such as long waiting times and were still able to access legal abortion. However, service users did experience negative emotional effects, as they were often left feeling scared, angry, and hopeless when they were not referred and/or were mistreated.Conclusions Findings indicate that conscientious objection could work in practice. However, it is currently failing some individuals on an emotional level, as not all doctors are adhering to policy and guidelines. Conscientious objection in the UK needs to be addressed, to ensure service users receive fair, impartial, non-judgmental care.