Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The TBRS*C computational model provides a mathematical implementation of the cognitive processes involved in complex span tasks. The logic of the core processes, i.e., encoding, refreshing/time-based decay and chunking, is based on Hebbian learning, synaptic facilitation, and long-term neural plasticity, respectively. The modeling, however, takes place on a cognitive rather than physiological level. Chunking is implemented as a process of searching sequences of memoranda in long-term memory and recoding them as a single unit which increases the efficacy of memory maintenance. Using TBRS*C simulations, the present study investigated how chunking and central working memory processes change with expertise.
Method
Hobby musicians and music students completed a complex span task in which sequences of twelve note symbols were presented for serial recall of pitch. After the presentation of each memorandum, participants performed an unknown, notated melody on an electric piano. To manipulate the potential for chunking, we varied if sequences of memoranda formed meaningful tonal structures (major triads) or arbitrary trichords. Hobby musicians and music students were each split up in a higher-expertise and a lower-expertise group and TBRS*C simulations were performed for each group individually.
Results
In the simulations, higher-expertise hobby musicians encoded memoranda more rapidly, invested less time in chunk search, and recognized chunks with a higher chance than lower-expertise hobby musicians. Parameter estimates for music students showed only marginal expertise differences.
Conclusion
We conclude that expertise in the TBRS model can be conceptualized by a rapid access to long-term memory and by chunking, which leads to an increase in the opportunity and efficacy of refreshing.
Funder
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Shah P, Miyake A. Models of Working Memory. An Introduction. In: Miyake A, Shah P, editors. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 1–27.
2. Time constraints and resource sharing in adults’ working memory spans;Barrouillet P;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2004
3. Pashler HE. The psychology of attention. Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press; 1999.
4. Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards;Gobet F;Cognitive Psychology,1996
5. Long-term working memory;Ericsson KA;Psychological Review,1995