Uptake of mental health benefits in women before and during the perinatal period in Austria: An analysis of health insurance data

Author:

Zechmeister-Koss Ingrid1,Kern Julia1,Edlinger Michael2,Hörtnagl Christine2,Lampe Astrid3,Buchheim Anna4,Paul Jean2

Affiliation:

1. Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment

2. Innsbruck Medical University

3. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research

4. University of Innsbruck

Abstract

Abstract Background Perinatal mental illness (PMI) is one of the major health problems during pregnancy and one year after birth (perinatal period), with strong evidence of its potential detrimental (future) effects on the health of children. However, many parents do not receive treatment for their mental health problems. In Austria, there is a lack of specialised services. The amount of mental health benefits uptake during the perinatal period is unknown. Methods We retrospectively analysed the uptake of five key mental health insurance benefits, one year before and during the perinatal period, by women who gave birth in 2017 and 2018. We used pseudonymised health insurance data, applying descriptive analysis to present overall uptake frequencies, and dissecting them into three life course periods: the year before birth, the pregnancy period, and the year after birth. Results 131 025 insured women gave birth in 2017 or 2018, representing around 80% of all births in Austria. Almost 20% of women claimed at least one of the five benefits during the perinatal period; this increased to one in four women when the year before pregnancy was included. Most women claimed only one benefit, usually only during one of the three life course periods. Benefits were claimed more frequently by the youngest (≤ 20 years) and the oldest (≥ 41 years) women. After adjusting for the shorter period of pregnancy, the uptake of benefits was highest during pregnancy. The most often used benefit was psychotherapy, while hospital admissions occurred least frequently. Conclusion Although the results likely underestimate the true uptake, because more services are available than covered in our data, and service use is usually lower than the prevalence of PMI, our uptake data corresponds to international prevalence figures, indicating a high use of benefits. Considering the gaps in specialised perinatal mental healthcare infrastructure and healthcare staff, the results call for more training and education and ensuring enough capacity to meet the needs. Additionally, an in-depth investigation of the quality of care is warranted to determine whether the differences in uptake between the three life-course periods are based on unmet needs or inappropriate care.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Rates and risk of postpartum depression—a meta-analysis;O'Hara MW;Int Rev Psychiatry,1996

2. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period;Howard LM;Lancet,2014

3. Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence;Gavin NI;Obstet Gynecol,2005

4. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: Systematic review and meta-analysis;Dennis C-L;BJPsych,2017

5. Anxiety disorders in postpartum women: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Goodman JH;J Affect Disorders,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3