Translation of oral health research priorities into research topics in an equity-based priority setting exercise

Author:

Nagraj Sumanth Kumbargere1,Nasser Mona2,Quinn Cath2,Callaghan Lynne2,Paisi Martha2

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Lecturer, University of Plymouth

2. University of Plymouth

Abstract

Abstract

Background: In the context of research priority setting, participants express their research priorities and ideas in various forms, ranging from narratives to explicit topics or questions. However, the transition from these expressions to well-structured research topics or questions is not always straightforward. Challenges intensify when research priorities pertain to interventions or diagnostic accuracy, requiring the conversion of narratives into the PICO (Participant, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format. Scope and findings: This project aimed to understand the challenges of engaging a diverse, multilingual population in setting oral health research priorities. While not a comprehensive priority-setting effort, we modified James Lind Alliance's (JLA) methods and used thematic analysis to establish a list of priority research topics and questions. This was accomplished by conducting interviews with 40 community participants and 14 dentists from various ethnic backgrounds in Malaysia. The interview language depended on participant preferences, including English, Malay, and Mandarin, with translations handled collaboratively by bilingual research assistants. The process involved thematic analysis, discussion with a research committee, and necessary modifications. Our interpretations revealed distinct categories of participant statements: explicit, complicated, implicit, and incomplete. In this study, we identified a three-step approach to translate research ideas that are presented either as explicit statements or as complicated narratives. Conclusions: Translating community research priorities poses inherent challenges. Our model, although not exhaustive, provides a valuable tool to assist research priority-setting groups in translating these priorities into meaningful research topics and questions, facilitating the equitable inclusion of diverse perspectives. Future research priority-setting endeavours should document their translation processes, thus aiding researchers in understanding and tackling the intricacies of this task.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference11 articles.

1. Nasser M. Setting priorities for conducting and updating systematic reviews [dissertation on the internet]. University of Plymouth; 2018 [cited 2024 23 Feb 24]. Available from: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/10849

2. Research priorities to reduce the global burden of dementia by 2025;Shah H;Lancet Neurol,2016

3. James Lind Alliance. Setting up a priority setting partnership. In: James Lind Alliance Guidebook. 2021. https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/jla-guidebook/downloads/JLA-Guidebook-Version-10-March-2021.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2024.

4. A novel method for involving women of colour at high risk for preterm birth in research priority setting;Franck LS;J Vis Exp [Internet],2018

5. Setting a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy: a participatory action research initiative;Gross PH;Dev Med Child Neurol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3